From: Marco Costalba (mcostalba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-12 02:56:50
On 10/12/07, Marco Costalba <mcostalba_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> So I would say a _possible_ policy is to not allow to register say
> if is already registered a function with a "compatible" signature.
This is wrong.
I would have said:
" a _possible_ policy is that a call like
overwrites any exsisting function with the same signature *or with a
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk