From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-16 18:00:23
Bjørn Roald wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Vera++ also sounds good too. I'll look at both.
> Vera++ may also provide a good path to supporting replacing boost with
> nested namespaces as I think it may be capable of reliably locating
> end braces of the original boost namespace. To approaches comes to
> mind. Use Vera++ to modify code directly or use it to enforce tagging
> of ending braces like this:
> } // end namespace boost
> In which case the rest would be trivial in bcp.
Also, Vera++ could be useful to fix potential issues such as include
guards without BOOST in symbols:
allowing the bcp translation to replace it with:
which would be much safer in allowing proper side-by-side headers from
two versions of boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk