From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-16 20:51:29
on Sun Oct 14 2007, "Sean Huang" <huangsean-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:
> Specifically, my questions are:
> 1. Do changes in this magnitude warrant a mini-review?
> 2. Is it a good idea that the new implementation be reviewed by other boost
> threading experts such as Peter and/or Howard? Take it to the next level,
> does it make sense to have a peer review process for at least significant
It's a good idea, but I don't think we should mandate it. The
autonomy of library developers to make improvements has always been a
core Boost policy, and taking that away could significantly dampen the
sense of ownership (and thus enthusiasm) of library authors.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk