Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-16 20:51:29

on Sun Oct 14 2007, "Sean Huang" <> wrote:

> Specifically, my questions are:
> 1. Do changes in this magnitude warrant a mini-review?
> 2. Is it a good idea that the new implementation be reviewed by other boost
> threading experts such as Peter and/or Howard? Take it to the next level,
> does it make sense to have a peer review process for at least significant
> changes?

It's a good idea, but I don't think we should mandate it. The
autonomy of library developers to make improvements has always been a
core Boost policy, and taking that away could significantly dampen the
sense of ownership (and thus enthusiasm) of library authors.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at