Re: [boost] [thread] Questions/concerns about recent thread lib changes

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-16 20:51:29

on Sun Oct 14 2007, "Sean Huang" <huangsean-AT-hotmail.com> wrote:

> Specifically, my questions are:
> 1. Do changes in this magnitude warrant a mini-review?
> 2. Is it a good idea that the new implementation be reviewed by other boost
> threading experts such as Peter and/or Howard? Take it to the next level,
> does it make sense to have a peer review process for at least significant
> changes?

It's a good idea, but I don't think we should mandate it.  The
autonomy of library developers to make improvements has always been a
core Boost policy, and taking that away could significantly dampen the
sense of ownership (and thus enthusiasm) of library authors.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com