Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-17 03:22:37

Next message: Markus SchÃ¶pflin: "Re: [boost] [intrusive] Expected failure markup."
Previous message: Marco Costalba: "Re: [boost] C++0x question"
In reply to: Michael Caisse: "[boost] A *smaller* release concept"
Next in thread: Nicola Musatti: "Re: [boost] A *smaller* release concept"
Reply: Nicola Musatti: "Re: [boost] A *smaller* release concept"

Michael Caisse wrote:
> Was there any consideration of doing a release that consisted
> of 1.34.1 and new libraries that have been accepted recently.
>
> No other changes.
>
Aren't there new libraries that depend on changes since 1.34.1?

Sebastian Redl

Next message: Markus SchÃ¶pflin: "Re: [boost] [intrusive] Expected failure markup."
Previous message: Marco Costalba: "Re: [boost] C++0x question"
In reply to: Michael Caisse: "[boost] A *smaller* release concept"
Next in thread: Nicola Musatti: "Re: [boost] A *smaller* release concept"
Reply: Nicola Musatti: "Re: [boost] A *smaller* release concept"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk