Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-19 06:06:09

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] Atomic ops supports for Alpha processors."
Previous message: John Maddock: "[boost] [test] Changes break Borland support"
In reply to: Miguel Tadeu: "[boost] [callback abstraction]Determining interest for proposal"
Next in thread: Miguel Tadeu: "Re: [boost] [callback abstraction]Determining interest for proposal"
Reply: Miguel Tadeu: "Re: [boost] [callback abstraction]Determining interest for proposal"

Miguel Tadeu wrote:
> I wrote a small library that attempts to abstract function calls.
In what way does this library differ from Boost.Function (or
tr1::function, for that matter)?

Sebastian Redl

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [interprocess] Atomic ops supports for Alpha processors."
Previous message: John Maddock: "[boost] [test] Changes break Borland support"
In reply to: Miguel Tadeu: "[boost] [callback abstraction]Determining interest for proposal"
Next in thread: Miguel Tadeu: "Re: [boost] [callback abstraction]Determining interest for proposal"
Reply: Miguel Tadeu: "Re: [boost] [callback abstraction]Determining interest for proposal"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk