|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-24 10:49:26
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Sigh, obviously I don't manage to create a small reproducer for the
> error seen at http://preview.tinyurl.com/23towf. (Scroll down to the
> last five errors, ignore the rest, this has been fixed by now.)
Can you please try changing
intrusive_ptr_add_ref( detail::get_pointer( m_ptr ) );
to
T * p = detail::get_pointer( m_ptr );
intrusive_ptr_add_ref( p );
?
It could be the intermediate get_pointer call that is tricking the compiler
into thinking that the call is not dependent.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk