From: shunsuke (pstade.mb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-24 15:37:22
Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Why not call boost_range_begin from range_begin?
> Not a bad idea ... but this doesn't address the problem of the changed
> meaning of the boost::range_iterator<> metafunction. (E.g., in your
> scheme, what is the return type of range_begin()?)
Right. There is no workaround for that name swapping. :-(
BTW, I think you added a workaround for msvc-7.1 array into Boost.Foreach.
That part is no longer needed.
You can remove it, waiting for Boost.Range tests to pass.
-- Shunsuke Sogame
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk