Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 09:17:47

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Thu Nov 01 2007, Beman Dawes <> wrote:
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> I hope everyone is using
>>> when merging changes between branches and trunk. That's very
>>> important if we're going to avoid merge hell.
>> The plan isn't to do what the TortoiseSVN docs call a "Range of
>> Revisions" merge, but rather what those docs call "Merging Two Different
>> Trees".
> Do I have to learn about TortoiseSVN in order to understand what
> you're saying? I don't really use Windows for development anymore.

I spent about 20 minutes searching online for documentation or examples
of using the merge command to do what is really a copy. I also checked
the "Version control with Subversion" book, both paper and online
versions. The TortoiseSVN docs are the only place I can find that
mentions this use case.

>> Since in effect that just copies the file from the trunk to the
>> release branch, there isn't any chance of merge hell, if I understand
>> what you mean. This approach also minimizes the chance that the code
>> will break, since the code is unchanged from the code being tested on
>> the trunk.
>> Is there any reason to use for a tree/tree merge?
> Probably, especially if you're ever merging back and forth between two
> trees.

But we aren't really merging. We are copying, using the merge command to
do the copy because the copy command doesn't have an overwrite option.

Hopefully the whole issue will go away once we change over
to 1.5.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at