From: Juergen Hunold (juergen.hunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 09:36:43
On Freitag 02 November 2007, Beman Dawes wrote:
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > It's not. This is what I was told to do to implement "test" target.
and the whole thread for the discussion leading to this.
test/Jamfile-v2 now marks all targets including "test" as explicit. So
it has to be explicitly called. Unfortunately, status/Jamfile.v2 simply
build-project ../libs/test/test ; # test-suite test
and therefore builds _no_ targets.
build-project ../libs/test/test//test ; # test-suite test
should build it again.
The right way is to remove "test" from the list of "explicit" targets in
test/Jamfile.v2. Else running bjam from that directory would still
build no targets...
> Why was this change committed? How could it have passed tests on your
> local machine?
Well, running the test suite from "status" would simply ignore the
explicit tests and result in no failures... :-(((
-- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * juergen.hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ivembh.de * * Geschäftsführer: ! Sitz des Unternehmens: Hannover * Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Siefer ! Amtsgericht Hannover, HRB 56965 * PD Dr.-Ing. Alfons Radtke !
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk