From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-02 12:49:07
Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Anthony Williams wrote:
>> I didn't see your previous suggestion to use "alert" rather than
>> "cancel". However, I do like interruption, and I have renamed cancellation to
>> interruption on trunk.
> Why not even take another step too:
> throw-at(threadid, exception);
> instead of interruption? After all it would underpin that interruption
> is not normal control flow.
That's a whole lot more heavyweight --- you'd have to transport the exception
into the thread in a type-safe manner in order to throw it. It's not
impossible --- you can copy the passed exception into a buffer along with a
function to throw it, and pass that over to the thread --- but it's
conceptually a lot more complicated.
-- Anthony Williams Just Software Solutions Ltd - http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk