From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-08 12:32:54
John Maddock wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>> Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
>>> I have not followed the discussion closely, so I am probably missing
>>> something, but why a new milestone? Unless I'm mistaken, issues that
>>> are "fixed", "closed", and with a "1.35" milestone, are precisely
>>> issues that will be fixed in the release (unless the relevant
>>> patches are reverted). So I don't understand the need for a new
>> For exactly the "unless the relevant patches are reverted" situation.
> Right: currently when something assigned to me was targeted for 1.35 I
> closed it once it was fixed in the Trunk: otherwise there's no way to tell
> what's been dealt with already :-)
> So I would actually be in favour of either a "pending merge to release"
> state, or else a new milestone for "1.35 Release Branch".
After a bit of thinking... I thought it would optimally be good to have
a ticket status to correspond to this. But it's not possible to change
those in Trac. But there is one aspect we can use to describe the state,
we can add a "Boost Release Branch" version, on par with the "Boost
Development Trunk" version we have. So a ticket that is part of the
1.35.0 milestone can:
* Be tagged as version "Boost Development Trunk" if it's only in the
trunk, whether it's resolved or not.
* Be tagged as version "Boost Release Branch" if it's been merged
successfully to branches/release. But only if it's resolved in the trunk
and verified to resolved in the release branch.
I think that follows the new release procedures accurately.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk