From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-08 11:54:32
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
>> I have not followed the discussion closely, so I am probably missing
>> something, but why a new milestone? Unless I'm mistaken, issues that
>> are "fixed", "closed", and with a "1.35" milestone, are precisely
>> issues that will be fixed in the release (unless the relevant
>> patches are reverted). So I don't understand the need for a new
> For exactly the "unless the relevant patches are reverted" situation.
Right: currently when something assigned to me was targeted for 1.35 I
closed it once it was fixed in the Trunk: otherwise there's no way to tell
what's been dealt with already :-)
So I would actually be in favour of either a "pending merge to release"
state, or else a new milestone for "1.35 Release Branch".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk