From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-08 13:49:01
on Thu Nov 08 2007, Marshall Clow <marshall-AT-idio.com> wrote:
>> > My point was that we should focus on making
>>> (the list of tickets assigned to the 1.35.0 milestone) a meaningful
>>> report for this release.
>>> That means establishing a 1.36.0 milestone, declaring the criteria for
>>> including a ticket in 1.35.0, telling people that if they want an
>>> exception they have to get you to okay it, and maybe making any
>>> assignments of tickets to 1.35.0 and 1.36.0 that are obvious. Then we
>>> all have a list of issues to focus on killing off and we don't need to
>>> pester people as much.
>>> If you would like me to take on some of these tasks, please ask me.
>>[dead silence since Monday]
>>Am I really the only one that thinks this matters? I realize that as
>>a project we don't have a lot of experience with effective use of bug
>>and task tracking, but we also haven't been all that effective in the
>>run-up to a release. Using the tools we have effectively can make a
> FWIW - I think you're on the right track here.
> The bugs in this report are the ones that someone has decided "need
> to be dealt with" for this release,
I'm not so sure. I don't think we've been paying enough attention to
guarantee that anyone really made a conscious decision about which
milestone each issue should be in, so while the report above should be
meaningful, I think it probably isn't meaningful yet.
That means, IMO, that all open tickets should be reviewed for
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk