From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-18 18:51:46
David Abrahams wrote:
>> That goes the same for the boost namespace. IMO, we need a clear
>> policy on what goes there. Lest, we'll have it filled up and
>> polluted with lotsa stuff before we know it.
> Yes, well, now we have a precedent that violates what is, IMO, the
> only reasonable policy. That makes it a little harder to make the
> policy official. But anyway, I have a strong suspicion that you and I
> substantially agree on that policy, so I would be very happy if you'd
> write something up. Then we have something concrete to argue about
Ok, I'll take this one. I see you've got the "standard practice"
defined in another post. I'll try to collect all the relevant
information from the current discussions and collect them into
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk