Boost logo

Boost :

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-27 20:28:31

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> That goes the same for the boost namespace. IMO, we need a clear
>>> policy on what goes there. Lest, we'll have it filled up and
>>> polluted with lotsa stuff before we know it.
>> Yes, well, now we have a precedent that violates what is, IMO, the
>> only reasonable policy. That makes it a little harder to make the
>> policy official. But anyway, I have a strong suspicion that you and I
>> substantially agree on that policy, so I would be very happy if you'd
>> write something up. Then we have something concrete to argue about
>> ;-)
> Ok, I'll take this one. I see you've got the "standard practice"
> defined in another post. I'll try to collect all the relevant
> information from the current discussions and collect them into
> a document.

I've collected all the relevant information from the discussions so
far. If there are more counter-arguments (Robert?) please post
them now. I'll post my recommendation (subject to discussion)
in the coming days.


Joel de Guzman

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at