Re: [boost] [inplace_factory] Question about nplace_factory

From: Corrado Zoccolo (czoccolo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-20 14:41:46

Hi Fernando
On Nov 19, 2007 10:20 PM, Fernando Cacciola <fernando.cacciola_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Hi Corrado,
> Indeed, I agree that the best factorization is to decouple the factory
> applicator from the argument list.
> In fact, the applicator should handle a generic tuple as the argument list
> (with at most some custom made tuple if dependency with fusion is a
> problem)
>
> Now that's a major make up for the factories, though one worth doing it
> IMO,
> so the big quesion is: would you be interested in doing that yourself?
>

Sure I'm interested, but my highest priority now is to make my polymorphic
value object library ready for review.

When I've done with my tests and documentation, I can start working on the
in_place refactorization. It needs to be handled with care, since there are
already some libraries depending on the current interface, and we are going
for an interface breaking change.

Corrado

Best
>
>
> --
> Fernando Cacciola
> SciSoft
> http://fcacciola.50webs.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________
dott. Corrado Zoccolo                          mailto:zoccolo_at_[hidden]
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The self-confidence of a warrior is not the self-confidence of the average
man. The average man seeks certainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls
that self-confidence. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and
calls that humbleness.
                              Tales of Power - C. Castaneda