From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-04 18:08:40
thanks for your positive review.
Eric Niebler wrote:
> John Torjo wrote:
>> The formal review of the Boost.Functional/Forward library, proposed by
>> Tobias Schwinger, begins today :
>> * What is your evaluation of the design?
> Good. I can think of a couple of missing features.
> - An option to handle const and non-const arguments up to N, and only
> [non-]const arguments from N to M.
That sentence is about a single scenario (not two or three), correct?
What use cases do you have in mind?
> - Automatically detect if the compiler supports variadic templates and
> rvalue references and use those instead. This can be a useful
> portability utility when such compilers become more common.
Yes, that seems a good idea.
>> * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
> Short and to the point. Would be nice if the reference section for each
> of the adaptors had a little example usage.
IIRC, I just failed to come up with small but meaningful samples. Maybe
I should loosen the criteria, figuring a stupid example might still be
better than no example ;-).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk