From: Ilya Sokolov (fal_delivery_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-26 02:19:46
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>>>> 2. Unfortunately original test modult function signature is
>>>>> unacceptable for DLL initialization. So i had to introduce new one.
>>>> I don't see it unacceptable, given the majority of
>>>> init_unit_test_suite() functions using BOOST_TEST_SUITE macro. I think
>>> See my other post.
>> What post?
> Look at the bottom of
I still don't see why is it unacceptable. Can you state it explicitly?
>>>> I want to seamlessly migrate from static UTF to shared. I need to
>>>> fallback to the static UTF where it is not supported (by toolchain).
>>> Where? The primary direction of my effort was to make sure shared library
>>> works consistently on all platforms.
>> Even on platforms that does not have shared libraries at all? ;-)
> On these platform it works as well, since if there is no shared libraries no
> problem can be either.
Problem arise with library that should work on both platforms, with and
without dll support.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk