From: Barco You (barcojie_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-08 22:14:01
There are xerces and miniXML ... I think it's the real reason not to do so
much redundance. :)
On 1/9/08, Adam Badura <abadura_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It seems to me that Boost lacks "typical XML parser" (by that I mean
> something offering DOM and SAX parsing as well as validation and maybe
> other features). I did not look at serialization that much but I suspect
> that it does not offer such properties.
> Why is that? Any technical reasons? Or maybe "political" reasons? Or
> perhabs simply no one did it?
> Adam Badura
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
-- ------------------------------- Enjoy life! Barco You
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk