From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-11 01:51:45
JD <jean.daniel.michaud <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> > JD <jean.daniel.michaud <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >> Hello,
> >> Loglite, the small logging library is back with new features.
> > Boost.Logging library is about to be reviewed. How do you place your
> > submission: as an alternative, as an addition. In former case can you
> > your approaches, designes etc.
> > Gennadiy
> Loglite is composed of a logger object, aggregating sinks. Each sink
> I would appreciate if you could have a look at the library, or at least
> the example and give me your impression.
No. I doubt I'll have time soon. But in a light of an upcoming review I would
be interrested to hear your opinion on Boost.Logging library as you are
obviosly currently are invested into the subject. Specifically from the
prospective: why can't you use it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk