From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-11 12:37:29
> On Friday 11 January 2008 15:47:59 Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>> dizzy wrote:
>>> I would like to know if boost implements something similar
>> I just skimmed your post very quicky, but it seems you might perhaps
>> want to read this thread:
> Thanks for your link, it was an interesting read (along with the referenced
> article). It appears this if-istype/else technique is widely employed when
> needing a non-intrusive Visitor, when one cannot modify original hierarchy
> API (even tho I can modify it I still prefer the nonintrusive version as I
> find the action of needing to visit the hierarchy a decision of the user and
> not a feature for the hierarchy to provide it).
> So the logic of finding the type liniarly can be rewritten in my code to use
> boost::mpl features as from the link provided. Even so, if boost does not
> have such a generic Visitor feature, wouldn't it be a good addition?
Honestly, I find its practical value rather questionable.
From where I stand, the need for such a thing does most likely indicate
that inheritance is probably used in a place where it shouldn't.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk