From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-14 14:18:01
On Jan 14, 2008 1:17 AM, Stjepan Rajko <stipe_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The review of the Switch library submitted by Steven Watanabe ends
> today (Sunday, January 13th). I would like to thank Steven for
> submitting a very useful library, as well as all those who have
> submitted reviews and/or contributed to the discussion (especially
> Tobias Schwinger and Joel de Guzman who have put in quite a bit of
> effort towards enhancing the design of the library).
> I will send a more detailed summary of the review as well as a
> decision in the following days. I currently have only 3 reviews to
> base a decision on, so any additional votes that anyone would like to
> contribute in the very near future would be very welcome.
I'm not going to make a very throughout review. I have accompanied the
And I'd like to vote (could be counted as a half vote) that switch
should not be accepted.
It seems there are still too many doubts about how switch should be
designed and which use cases it should serve.
IMO, it should be rejected now. Then after all doubt about its goals
and design is saned, it should be reproposed and then be accepted.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk