From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-14 20:38:20
Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> * hmmm.... maybe labels should be an mpl set.
> No, thank you. mpl set is buggy and slow.
> Also, one thing that needs to be nailed down is: What Is I?
> Tobias was using it as the index into the list of labels:
> mpl::int_<0>, mpl::int_<1>, mpl::int_<2>, ...
> In my original interface and as you seem to be using it I is one of:
> mpl::at_c<labels, 0>::type, mpl::at_c<labels, 1>::type,
> mpl::at_c<labels, 2>::type
It's in the concept I presented:
I An MPL Integral Constant type
Anything special I am missing?
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk