From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-31 11:45:15
Thanks for your reaction, it is nice to hear, and I will have a look at gil.
Tom Brinkman wrote:
> I'm a long-time follower of this mailing list, and a former "Review
> Wizard". I think
> that this geometry is more than adquate for a full review by the boost
> It may not meet everyones needs, but a detailed review of a geometry library
> would be most welcome and needed. Even if its not approved initially, it
> set the standard of what we want in geometry library.
> I have a feeling that we have many
> experts in this area, many of which could give detailed reviews. Any
> geometry library
> author willing to throw his hat in the ring so-to-speak should be welcomed
> and encouraged.
> I've reviewed the documentation (1 hour),
> and the authors appear to be strong domain experts and have more than a
> fair chance of getting it approved. I thank that a boostified geometry is
> badly needed.
> I would also like to help ensure that it is compatible with boost::gil. The
> would compliment each other.
> Thanks for submitting this library and offering it up for review.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- ------------------------------------- Barend Gehrels, Geodan Holding b.v., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, www.geodan.nl
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk