From: Lubomir Bourdev (lbourdev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-04 18:07:31
Beman Dawes wrote:
> 4) GIL isn't licensed under BSL -- is this ok? I thought we were
trying to move as much to BSL as possible.
I believe GIL is already under Boost Software License. What made you
conclude that it isn't? Is there a header somewhere that needs changing?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk