From: Jeff Garland (azswdude_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-04 18:57:16
On Feb 4, 2008 4:07 PM, Lubomir Bourdev <lbourdev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
> > 4) GIL isn't licensed under BSL -- is this ok? I thought we were
> trying to move as much to BSL as possible.
> I believe GIL is already under Boost Software License. What made you
> conclude that it isn't? Is there a header somewhere that needs changing?
The documentation in the 1.35 release snapshot said it's the MIT license --
so it's probably just a docs change...I didn't actually look at the source
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk