|
Boost : |
From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-10 11:39:58
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 05:11:46PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
>
> I always have trouble understanding the fine differences between
> Cygwin's gcc (uses probably pristine gcc source with Cygwin's
> POSIX layer) and mingw (a real port to Windows?). I really wonder why
> porting attempts to Windows are not already part of gcc source ...
MinGW includes a runtime environment as well as the compiler.
That's outside the scope of GCC.
GCC on cygwin relies on the cygwin-provided libc, which is a POSIXy
runtime environment, not a Windowsy one like MinGW's.
So there's nothing that could be included in the GCC source - the choice
of runtime (cygwin, djgpp, mingw, whatever) is external to the compiler.
> > Replacing string in a file? The VS2005 IDE :)
>
> And via script?
The Windows kind of guys I know don't do scripts. Incredible I know ;)
> > I'm a Windows kind of guy ;) When I'll have a decent debugger on Linux
> > (gdb on a scale from 1 to 10 , gets 1; ddd on a scale from 1 to 10, gets
> > 3.5), I might consider having a dual boot.
Personally I'd swap those numbers, I'd rather have no GUI than DDD's.
Jon
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk