Boost logo

Boost :

From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-18 09:16:33


John Maddock wrote:

> How about simply "known at compile time" as a compromise :-)
>
> John.

I'm a mathematician.
And I prefer "known at compile-time".
It is the standard term in this context.

Also, "known in advance" is imprecise.
In advance of what?
Both as a mathematician and as a programmer I like precision.

--Johan Råde


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk