From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-18 11:34:55
> > How about simply "known at compile time" as a compromise :-)
> > John.
> I'm a mathematician.
> And I prefer "known at compile-time".
> It is the standard term in this context.
> Also, "known in advance" is imprecise.
> In advance of what?
> Both as a mathematician and as a programmer I like precision.
OK, so let's go for "known at compile-time" :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk