From: Marco Costalba (mcostalba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-24 19:27:53
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Brian Ravnsgaard Riis
> I don't deal in raw pointers in application code though (well, if I can
> avoid it), so I added methods to the
> dispatcher template to return shared_ptrs instead. get_shared_by_key was
> the name I hacked up.
thanks for your words.
Actually the choice to mimic a standard operator new is mainly due to
- Keep it simple and with well known behaviour, as a toy should be
- Do not impose a choice on a particular smart pointer, but let the
user wrap the returned pointer in his/her preferred one. Of course the
smart pointer class could be passed in as a template parameter, but
this complicates the implementation and so goes against one of my main
goals with this factory.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk