Re: [boost] Updating the Boost license information for 1.35?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-12 08:56:44

Beman Dawes wrote:
> Rick Yorgason wrote:
>> Hey everyone, I've noticed a few things coming from this mailing
>> list:
>>
>> * There's some rumblings about getting the 1.35 release out the door
>> soon.
>>
>> * A list was compiled showing that uBLAS was the only Boost library
>> that wasn't using the Boost Software License, or at least, the only
>> one that couldn't be easily changed.
>> <http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2007/05/122130.php>
>>
>> * With little fanfare, permission was granted to release uBLAS under
>> the BSL last September.
>> <http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/ublas/2007/09/2342.php>
>>
>> So, hey, this is great news!  My question is, what do you think the
>> chances are that 1.35 could be released under a blanket license?
>> Since the only work required is changing some comments in some
>> source files,
>> it would be a shame if we had to wait another year and a half for
>> this.

To the best of my knowledge all the source files in uBlas have been 
converted to the BSL - in fact I think I may have been the one who did the 
conversion :-)

John.