Re: [boost] boost-libraries should be independent from others?

From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-13 09:13:43

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 13 March 2008 03:44 am, Kowalke Oliver (QD IT PA AS) wrote:
> Hello,
> I'll can remeber that in the list or on the web-site it was suggested that
> new boost libraries should be independent from other boost libraries. If
> this is still correct - I'm wondering because I wouldn't reinvent the
> threading, signaling etc. libraries. What do you think?
> regards, Oliver

I think this page is what you're thinking of, but it's not that extreme:

http://www.boost.org/more/library_reuse.htm

- -- 
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH2SiM5vihyNWuA4URAkMJAJ946DxkhTXE/CL4u4PZlIPQcmD9GQCgzQXv
BhnPWUEetENuBos9wonkauU=
=wmCo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----