Boost logo

Boost :

From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-19 10:02:58

On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:

> For a full list of 1.35.0 test regressions, see

Or, better yet:

> There are a few 1.35.0 regressions I'm not particularly concerned
> about; VC++ 7.1 is now old news, and no one seems to care much about
> the Intel/Windows compiler.
> Given that VC++ 9.0 has been out for awhile now, it would be nice to
> kill off a few more of those regressions before 1.35.0 ships:
> * Graph

As Richard Webb noted, it fails for the same reason as VC++ 8.0 fails,
so we should just mark this as "expected" as well. Okay for me to go
ahead and do that on the trunk and release branch?

> Red regressions I'm concerned about are:
> * Numeric/interval on Darwin.
> * Serialization on Darwin.

This is the trivial patch to fix the Serialization failures on Darwin:

Index: libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp
--- libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp (revision
+++ libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp (working
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ public:
      friend class
      friend class boost::archive::save_access;
- void save_impl(const long l){
+ void save_impl(long l){
          long ll = l;
          char size = 0;
          if(l < 0){

Tested on Darwin (both PowerPC and Intel); shall I commit to the trunk
and the release branch?

        - Doug

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at