Boost logo

Boost :

From: Kevin Scarr (kscarr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-22 14:18:05

Marco Costalba wrote:

> It comes much more naturally to me to think at this:
> if (ptr)
> ptr->doSomething();

Ok. This usage is fine with me. I guess I just hadn't seen the
overload<> as being a declaration of an object with pointer behaviour.

If that is what it is, then I would prefer the usage above.

Thanks for the clarification,

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at