Boost logo

Boost :

From: Kevin Scarr (kscarr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-26 06:56:42


Daniel Frey wrote:

> Yepp, but I think it's not relevant. Does it guarantee to never throw
> when used correctly? A lot of exception guarantees expect dtor's to
> never throw, although in theory they could. asserts (which also includes
> BOOST_ASSERT) are meant to be never triggered when used correctly,
> right? So a guarantee like "never throws" always assumes correct usage.

Ok. I take the approach "never throws" actually means "never throws"
regardless of usage.

>
> Also, my question is not about the current *implementation* (or any
> specific implementation at all), but about the *interface* shared_ptrs
> intends to provide. What happens if I switch to GCC's implementation of
> std::shared_ptr in the future? Or some other compiler/platform?

Sorry, I thought you were asking about boost::shared_ptr. I did not know
that a std::shared_ptr had been defined. If it has, then you would need
to look to its documentation.

Kevin


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk