From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-28 16:02:11
on Fri Mar 28 2008, Sohail Somani <sohail-Jk4wshXjlOsFFmt/ZbAu/w-AT-public.gmane.org> wrote:
> At least the tests should be updated to show proper workarounds if a new
> feature doesn't work properly across popular compilers (1711). I am not
> using the bleeding edge (g++ 4.1 - bleeding is 4.3?).
> I leave it up to you to decide the showstopping-ness of it all but the
> tests will fail (and so will code that tries to mimic the tests) on a lot
> of machines. Robert pinged Dave about the issue but I haven't heard
> anything more.
He did? I didn't get any private email about it and haven't been able
to keep up with this list for the last few weeks.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk