Re: [boost] [1.36.0] High priority compilers for this release?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-04 03:53:55

Beman Dawes wrote:
>> I'm inclined to agree to that: Intel have been extremely responsive
>> in the past in responding to compiler issues relating to Boost, and
>> given the level of conformance offered by this compiler, does it
>> really soak up that much time to officially support it?  Incidently,
>> it's good to have at least one EDG based front end in our official
>> support list, even if it does emulate the MSVC bugs ;-)
>
> Would you like to volunteer for testing and followup:-?

OK I walked into that I guess ! :-)

Yes OK, forward all Intel-Win32 issues to me and I'll try and look into 
them.

What I can't easily do is run the full regression tests on my laptop :-(

John.