Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-04 03:59:37


Joe Gottman wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> Joe Gottman quite correctly points out in
>>
>> http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1762
>>
>> that shared_ptr should honor user definitions of
>> BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS and disable MT support.
>>
>> Unfortunately, despite documenting quite clearly that
>> BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS is a user macro, Boost.Config defines it in
>> some situations. This means that I can't rely on this macro to
>> reflect the user's intent, as I don't know whether it's been set
>> explicitly by the user, or implicitly (and incorrectly IMO) by
>> Boost.Config.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>
>
> The code in suffix.hpp looks like
>
> #if defined(BOOST_DISABLE_WIN32) && defined(_WIN32) \
> && !defined(BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS) && !defined(BOOST_HAS_PTHREADS)
> # define BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS
> #endif
>
>
> As far as I can tell, the purpose of this is to disable threading if
> Windows is disabled and there is no other threading system available.
> I think we can get the same result in a much clearer fashion without
> touching BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS by the following:
>
> #if defined(BOOST_DISABLE_WIN32) && defined(_WIN32)
> # undef BOOST_HAS_WINTHREADS
> #endif

Doug, what effect would none of BOOST_HAS_WINTHREADS, BOOST_HAS_PTHREADS and
BOOST_HAS_THREADS being defined have on shared_ptr?

John.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk