From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-04 14:53:28
Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2008, at 12:35 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> In another thread, Doug Gregor wrote:
>>> The other issue is that it would be great to test gcc-4.3 in C++0x
>>> mode (-std=gnu++0x) as well as C++98 mode. Then we can start taking
>>> advantage of some of the 0x features.
>> Yes, and some other compilers are also starting to add C++0x features.
>> Has there been any discussion as to how Boost.Config is going to
>> availability or not of C++0x features? That would seem to be the first
>> step in what promises to be a long, winding, but *very* interesting
>> productive path.
> I started this discussion a while ago:
> Boost 1.35.0 already contains some macros for C++0x features available
> now, e.g., BOOST_HAS_STATIC_ASSERT (used by boost/static_assert.hpp),
> BOOST_HAS_VARIADIC_TMPL, BOOST_HAS_RVALUE_REFS, and
> BOOST_HAS_DECLTYPE. They have their own section of the Boost.Config
> documentation ("Macros that describe C++0x Features"), and I believe
> that accurately reflect the capabilities of released compilers.
I thought I'd mention... Along with config macro defs I started
extracting all the Config rewrite macros
into a separate library
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk