From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-09 11:14:37
Peter Dimov wrote:
> John Maddock:
>> Peter Dimov wrote:
>>> The tests are indeed too permissive... but the real reason is that
>>> config_test is always run with <threading>multi, so the default
>>> configuration is never tested. Is this correct? Most of our other
>>> tests do not use <threading>multi, so it seems reasonable to run
>>> config_test in this mode as well (in addition to the existing
>>> <threading>multi run).
>> Ah, I'll add another build variant for that test.
> Can you please add it for config_info as well? Oddly, it seems that
> currently it's being run without <threading>multi.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk