Re: [boost] [move semantics] Do we have any plan for move semantics emulation?

From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-11 13:22:22

Hello,

In 2005 David Abrahams presented its implementation of  move semantics.
In Jul 24, 2006 Ion Gaztañaga posted 
http://www.nabble.com/-move-semantics--Do-we-have-any-plan-for-move-semantics-emulation--to5464232.html#a5470492

Since then there is some Boost libraries that use this implementation 
internnally (I'm thinking of course on Boost.Interprocess, Boost.Thread), 
but each one changing the namespace.
In addition Boost.Thread has an internal move class with a simplified 
implementation intendeed for the same sematics.

This make very difficult to interact between different libraries using the 
same concept but with a different name. In addition there is a risk that 
these implementation diverge.

Even if the implementation is only an emulation ot the C++0x move semantics, 
this should be better than nothing?

I'd like to reiterate the Ion question, "Do we have any plan for move 
semantics emulation ?"

Best regards
_____________________
Vicente Juan Botet Escriba