Re: [boost] [move semantics] Do we have any plan for move semantics emulation?

From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-11 13:53:48

On 11/04/2008, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>  I'd like to reiterate the Ion question, "Do we have any plan for move
>  semantics emulation ?"

I've started work on boostifying the Adobe move library for use with
Boost.Unordered (which was suggested during the review) and maybe
other libraries, although I want to adapt it so it'll work with older
compilers, C++-0x move semantics and other move implementations (there
are several in use, and the Adobe library doesn't support non-copyable
objects - which is important for libraries such as Boost.Thread). I've
been working in the subversion sandbox
(http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/branches/sandbox/move), but there's
still more to do.

Daniel