Boost logo

Boost :

From: shunsuke (pstade.mb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-19 05:26:12

Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
> [ sorry for the delay, it was general election time here in Italy and
> I had to return home for voting ]
> - What is your evaluation of the design?
> - Please always state in your review, whether you think the library should be
> accepted as a Boost library!
> Yes, but only after a mini review of the documentation only. I believe
> that the author will be able to come up with an excellent
> documentation.

Thank you.

> - Final comments
> Unfortunately I think that with so few reviews (just mine for now?),
> the library will have an hard time getting into Boost at this
> time. Probably the author didn't do a good job at selling it, even if
> many expressed interest in the past.
> If the library were to be rejected, I think that the author should
> resubmit a just a subset of it for inclusion, which would have a far greater
> chance to be appreciated and evaluated in a short time.
> This subset, IMHO, should concentrate on stateless function objects
> and should at least contain:
> Other advanced features, like pipability and infix notation (I like
> this one!) could then be evaluated once the basic functionality has
> been sold :). So should more hard-core functional capabilities like
> memoization and the fix point combinator. Support for static
> initialization of function objects could also come in a second time.

It would be a good idea.
But I'm going to give up mainly because of lack of interests
and documentation skills.


Shunsuke Sogame

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at