|
Boost : |
From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-20 07:09:48
John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
>
> Looks like a bug in the MS implementation to me, the test case appears to be
> something like:
>
> typedef int (&func_ref)(float, double);
> typedef result_of<function_ref(float,double)>::type result_type; // error
> here.
>
Thanks.
Following on with the type_traits failures with is_polymorphic
(http://tinyurl.com/6jq57y):
If you have:
class foo
{
public:
virtual ~foo()
{
}
};
class bar : virtual public foo
{
public:
virtual ~bar()
{
}
};
Then boost::is_polymorphic<bar> is true, but mstr1::is_polymorphic<bar> is false.
If i either:
-make foos destructor non-virtual
-add an additional virtual method to bar
-change the defintion of bar to 'class bar : public foo'
then mstr1::is_polymorphic<bar> becomes true.
MS Bug?
Thanks,
Richard Webb
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk