Re: [boost] [egg] Review (at last)

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-20 17:32:47

Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Daniel Walker
> <daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:26 AM, shunsuke <pstade.mb_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>>  > But I'm going to give up mainly because of lack of interests
>>  > and documentation skills.
>>
>>  Well, I wouldn't throw in the towel just yet!
> 
> Yes, It would be a pity!
> 
>> I think Giovanni's
>>  suggestion to resubmit a subset of the library may be a very good
>>  idea. Keep it simple. A simpler library would also be easier to
>>  review. You brought up some interesting points in your response to my
>>  comments on Tuesday (especially regarding the usefulness of egg::lazy)
>>  and I've been thinking about it on and off all week. I believe there
>>  may be a real opportunity here, if you don't mind refractoring things
>>  a bit. Oh, and I hereby volunteer to help with the documentation, if
>>  you like.

FWIW, I wanted to do a review, but the review is in such a bad timing.
BoostCon 08 is 2 weeks away and people (me included) are very busy
preparing for it. I think this is another crucial reason why
there aren't more reviews. Another big reason for me is that
we are also struggling to get Spirit2 out the door in time
for BoostCon 08.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net