Re: [boost] [egg] Review (at last)

From: shunsuke (pstade.mb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-20 17:43:08

Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
>> I think Giovanni's
>>  suggestion to resubmit a subset of the library may be a very good
>>  idea. Keep it simple. A simpler library would also be easier to
>>  review. You brought up some interesting points in your response to my
>>  comments on Tuesday (especially regarding the usefulness of egg::lazy)
>>  and I've been thinking about it on and off all week. I believe there
>>  may be a real opportunity here, if you don't mind refractoring things
>>  a bit. Oh, and I hereby volunteer to help with the documentation, if
>>  you like.
> 
> I'm willing to help too! (but be aware that I'm not an English speaker
> and I've been known to slack in producing the documentation for my own
> library).

It's really cool if you two help me.
I will contact you as soon as I make an outline of a new simplified doc.
If you and users keep the interests until then, I can resubmit it.
BTW, judging from a few feedbacks, we have to document what result_of is.

Regards,

-- 
Shunsuke Sogame