From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-22 13:23:33
Sohail Somani wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> Other than that, it looks good to me. Good job rewriting the
>>> dangerous parts rather than patching in the thread-safety.
>> I looked into this in some detail. I concluded that a) it would be
>> very hard to do and would muck the library and b) it would slow
>> down a lot. It has changed my whole perception as to how/when
>> to use multi-threading.
> I agree. I had the same change in perception after reading your code.
> Only thing that worries me is the portability of it.
LOL - well, at least we don't have to worry about portability
of a threading library, primitives etc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk