From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-22 12:51:51
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Sohail Somani wrote:
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>>> Other than that, it looks good to me. Good job rewriting the
>>>> dangerous parts rather than patching in the thread-safety.
>>> I looked into this in some detail. I concluded that a) it would be
>>> very hard to do and would muck the library and b) it would slow
>>> down a lot. It has changed my whole perception as to how/when
>>> to use multi-threading.
>> I agree. I had the same change in perception after reading your code.
>> Only thing that worries me is the portability of it.
> LOL - well, at least we don't have to worry about portability
> of a threading library, primitives etc.
Those are things that can be fixed in a library which is much easier to
fix than a compiler.
-- Sohail Somani http://uint32t.blogspot.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk