Boost logo

Boost :

From: James Talbut (James.Talbut_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-24 03:53:10

There have been various discussions on here about the problems caused by
_SECURE_SCL, but I haven't seen any concrete plans for changes to boost
build to handle it.
At a minimum the build system should be changed to enable those users
wanting _SECURE_SCL=0 to do so easily - ideally by providing an argument
to bjam.
Is someone working on this?
P Consider the environment. Please don't print this email.


This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, do not use or disclose the information in any way, notify me immediately, and please delete it from your system.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at