From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-25 11:40:25
James Talbut wrote:
> There have been various discussions on here about the problems caused by
> _SECURE_SCL, but I haven't seen any concrete plans for changes to boost
> build to handle it.
> At a minimum the build system should be changed to enable those users
> wanting _SECURE_SCL=0 to do so easily - ideally by providing an argument
> to bjam.
> Is someone working on this?
How about putting:
Into the requirements section of your project?
-- _________________________________________ _ _ | Roland Schwarz |_)(_ | aka. speedsnail | \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz_at_[hidden] ________| http://www.blackspace.at
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk